Sunday, 26 April 2009

Nasscom in denial mode

Moneycontrol.com has an interview with the Nascomm chief to discuss the implications of the new Grassley/Durbin legislation on H-1B visa curbs. I find Nasscom defense to be absolutely weak and even a 10 year old will  have the IQ to understand why it holds no water. The bigger story here is the abuse of the L-1 visa by IT companies to shop Indian bodies to the US. Increased scrutiny of those applications will have bigger implications then the H-1b visa where according to Nasscom only 30% of the visa's are granted to Indian IT companies.
How this affect property prices in tech capitals is another story.

Don't see new H1B proposal turning into an Act: NASSCOM

Published on Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 20:50 , Updated at Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 17:32 
Source : CNBC-TV18


US lawmakers have introduced a new bill with additional restrictions on H1 B visas. Ganesh Natarajan, Chairman of the National Association of Software and Services Companies (NASSCOM), said if this proposal passes in the current format then it will have a fairly disastrous impact on the IT sector.

“But I am hopeful that over the next three-months we will not see this really becoming an Act.”

Meanwhile, Commerce Minister Kamal Nath said he is concerned by the contents of H1B visa bill by Senator Durbin and Senator Grassley. "The bill will restrict the ability of Indian IT companies to compete in the US market place. The bill is not in line with US President Barack Obama's stand against protectionism at the G20 meet and not in line with our desire to mainstream development in the Dohanegotiations."

Also Read:

US's new H1-B proposal anti-trade: NASSCOM 

New H1-B bill wants Indian IT cos to hire more in US

Here is a verbatim transcript of the exclusive interview with Ganesh Natarajan on CNBC-TV18. Also watch the accompanying video.

Q: This is not law as yet and it is only presented for legislation but what kind of an impact does this likely to have?

A: If it passes the way it is, obviously it is going to have fairly disastrous impact because this particular piece of legislation is very different from the last time they presented. 

This proposal also includes a provision called 50/50, which means that if you employ more than 50% of your people who are visa dependent, then you cannot employ more people with visas. So that’s very problematic.

We have spent a lot of time with Senator Grassley and Senator Durbin and we hope that they understand the implications.

The implications being that this kind of fly in the face of free trade, it primarily will target Indian companies. So I am very hopeful that over the next three-months we will not see this really becoming an act.

Q: If this does go through what does this do to cost structures because this gives on site off shore a completely new meaning especially given the 50-50 provision?

A: If a company is employing 5,000 employees in the US on a normal basis, 70% of them could be H1 or L1 Visas, it could literally mean that you will have to find replacement of about 1500 people and its not just the difficulty of finding the replacement but training them the cost involved, there could be a lot of business discontinuity and I personally feel that people will realize it when they go for the debate in the house, it wont get passed atleast certainly the way its being filed.

Q: A lot of people in the US might be viewing this as a restrictive trade practice what Indian IT companies are doing in terms of explaining the situation as far as our position is concerned?

A: We have had 3-4 meetings we worked with Tech-America which is the local association there, we have had sit down meetings with various people and they understand this. We even mentioned that this will specifically be seen as against India which is not a good thing and they have heard us and I think atleast the indication that we got was okay let this get filed, we will discuss it whether the US legislation discusses it before during and after the event, so that’s why I am not particularly perturbed, it could be disastrous if its passed in the current format but I am pretty sure that it wont.

No comments:

Post a Comment